Democrats using the same old smokescreen – victimhood and racism

While the Democrats were getting ready to pass Obamacare last Saturday, they were also busy concocting a scheme to deflect the avalanche of anger that they knew was headed their way after the vote was passed.

They created an outrageous production where they used the black members of their caucus to exploit the civil-rights movement of the 1960’s. Pelosi and other white socialists joined hands with black socialists and decided to defiantly walk right through the crowd that was gathered outside of the Capital instead of taking the underground tunnel that runs from their offices to the House Chamber. They did this in order to provoke reactions from the white racist protesters also known as Tea Party members.

When Pelosi led her despicable colleagues through the ignorant unwashed masses, they were met with shouts of “kill the bill” as well as other phrases showing their disgust at what they knew was about to happen.

As a result of their staged march through the crowd, three horrific incidents supposedly occurred:

• Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) claimed that he was spit on by a protestor.
• Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) claimed that he was called a “nigger” 15 times. (I wonder if Lewis had one of those click-counters in his pocket.)
• Then there’s ole Barney Frank (D-Ma.) who claimed that a protestor called him a “faggot.”

So far, only the Barney Frank allegations have been substantiated by other witnesses.

As far as Rep. Cleaver’s claim that he was spit on, the supposed incident was captured on video and promptly put on YouTube. It shows an elderly man cupping his hands and shouting at the procession of Democrats going up the steps of the Capital.

Check out the video and judge for yourself. The time frame of when the incident supposedly happens is between 1:15 and 1:25.

In my opinion, Rep. Cleaver is not only a liar, but also a pretty damn bad actor. Notice how he only wipes his face when he reaches the top of the steps (1:41) when he’s sure that the cameras are on him. He waits 16 seconds before wiping the protesters spit off his face, and then he only wipes it with his bare hand instead of using a handkerchief, or even his sleeve. I know that if someone spit in my face, I would wipe it off with whatever was available, then run to the nearest washroom and thoroughly wash my face. But that’s just me. The protester’s hands were cupped to amplify his voice as they were well before and after Cleaver passed by. This racist old white guy only spit at Cleaver and not at the other black representatives that passed by him? The protester was later arrested then released when Cleaver chose not to press charges. He chose to not press charges because he damn well knew that his charges wouldn’t hold up under scrutiny.

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver – you are a race-baiting fraud and a disgrace to the U.S. Congress!

As for Rep. Lewis’s claim that he was called a “nigger” 15 times, I contend that it was either a bald-face lie, or Lewis was suffering flashbacks from 46 years ago when racist southern Democrats were calling him by that name. There is not a single documentation or piece of audio to back up his claims. The mainstream media was also there, and not one of them came forward to verify Lewis’s claims. If they had audio of even one instance of the use of the N word, it would have already been played a billion times on every network affiliate all over the country; not to mention MSNBC and CNN.

Andrew Breitbart of Breibart.Com, Bighollywood.Com, Bigjournalism.Com, and Biggovernment.Com, has offered a personal $10,000 reward to anyone who can produce proof of a single time that the N-word was used towards Lewis. Breibart has also challenged Lewis to take a polygraph test regarding his claim. If Lewis passes the test, Breibart would give $10,000 to the United Negro College Fund.

Mr. Breibart need not worry; he could put that 10 grand towards starting another website because they’ll never come up with any substantiated proof to back up his bullshit claims. While I’m at it, let me say something about Rep. John Lewis. The man is one of the top race-baiters in congress – always has been. (It’s a toss-up between him and Charlie Rangel) In my opinion, he’s an out-and-out racist who for decades has used his connection to Martin Luther King Jr. as a shield against criticism from his anti-white and anti-Semitic diatribes.

Now we come to ole Barney Frank. There is supposedly verification from other witnesses that someone did indeed call him a “faggot.” The person who called Frank that name was wrong for doing so. However, Barney Frank is in fact Gay; he’s totally “out” and doesn’t shy away from his sexual orientation. So why is using this inappropriate term to describe Barney Frank treated as a far worse slander than calling someone a “Hitler” or “Nazi” or “War Criminal” when it’s obvious that the person is none of the above. Why is being called an ugly word to describe a gay person worse than being called a mass murderer of millions of people? I’m specifically referring to the slanderous names that the left used to describe George W. Bush for eight long years. Bush was also accused of masterminding 911 because he didn’t run out of a classroom fast enough. Rush Limbaugh and other prominent conservatives and Republicans have also been called killers in one way or another. In this particular case with Barney Frank, it was one moron among thousands who called him a “faggot.” In contrast, members of the mainstream media have called George W. Bush a Nazi, Fascist, War Criminal, etc. Again, which is more slanderous, more irrisponsible, more offensive? I contend that I would be much more offended and angry if someone called me a murderer, rapist, or Nazi, than if they called me a “honky” or “cracker” – after all, I am white!

If Barney Frank and his ilk are so upset by the term “faggot”, why aren’t they front and center complaining about the decades long use of the word by black “rap” or “hip-hop” artists? Can it be because blacks are overwhelmingly Democrats so Barney will put up with the word for political purposes? Spare me the phony outrage Barney!

That whole scene was created by the Democrats in order to goad emotional and frustrated people into doing or saying something stupid. I believe that they would have loved it if some whacko from the crowd took a shot at somebody – as long as they weren’t the ones that got hit. If the last year has proved anything, it’s that these left-wing zealots would do or say just about anything to discredit or destroy their opposition. The ends justify the means times a thousand!

I’m not buying any of this bull, and neither should anyone else!